We recently had both the candidates who were running for the local Congressman spot in the House of Representatives. Both Rush Holt, and Alan Bateman came to North Brunswick to take our questions, and provide insight as to what their stance was on certain topics, and how we would benefit from them being in Congress.
In my opinion, Rush Holt would have won this if it was a debate. When both candidates were asked similar questions, I felt that Holt had stronger responses, thus gaining the upper hand over Bateman. Although I don't completely agree with the views of either candidate, I believe that Holt's answers were more thorough than Bateman's.
On some topics, Bateman seemed to have a good angle, but could not develop his ideas enough, and on others he just didn't know what to say. If there were one question where he won out over Holt, it would be the one asking "what is your opinion of the tenure system, and should some teachers not deserve it?" I felt that since he had a family background in the subject, he was able to give a better answer than Holt, even though oddly enough Holt was a teacher.
Anyone else have opinions on them?